Dan McCarthy Has it Right About...Nationalism

.

.
.

.
In his article, “The Nationalist Surprise” (https://spectator.us/nationalist-surprise/…) that correctly begins, “The movement is beginning because conventional politics is at an end,” Dan McCarthy goes on to make the all too obvious point; “How many times do pundits with conventional sensibilities have to be surprised before they twig to their own blindness? They were surprised by BREXIT. They were surprised by Donald Trump. And now, while they’re distracted by Donald Trump’s latest tweets, they’re setting themselves up to be surprised by another nationalist miracle — the wholesale replacement of the decrepit conservative movement by a new national conservatism.”

McCarthy is right to be tuned into this new Nationalism that rejects the Imperialist aims of Anglo-American Globalism.

The rest of the world has rejected the American dream of an “Americanized world,” and FINALLY many Americans are too.

Dan McCarthy ends with the truth, “The old, post-Cold War order of weak borders, straitjacketed free-trade ideology, and endless war for utopian ideological objectives is rapidly failing, and what will replace it has already begun to arise. This week’s National Conservatism gathering was both a sign of that and a catalyst for the further transformation of the American right.”
.

Why This Raging Obsession With Trump?

Donald J. Trump

.

.
At first glance, the outrage over the recent release of William Barr's summary of the Mueller report is puzzling.

After all AG Barr did quote a critical portion of that report that was very clear about their finding no evidence of Russian Collusion with the Trump team. He also quoted a portion that made no determination on obstruction, leaving that up to William Barr, who said he didn't find enough evidence of that charge either.

There is STILL a hysterical hope among some that, "When the entire report is released, we'll see that William Barr was wrong. There is STILL a determined belief among some that, "We WILL get him (Trump)."

WHY?

Why do so many refuse to accept the results of this report?

It's NOT ideological. It's NOT based in an opposition to bad policies. The economy is booming and there's no substantial support for, even a more open border policy. If there was, the same people would've been outraged by the very strident, anti illegal immigration comments Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama and others have made over the past decade. There was no such outrage then, so it would seem to indicate the current "outrage" is not genuine.

So, it seems to be a personal dislike of Trump's contentious personality, fueled by the "team sports" political environment that exists today, but there's more...something fanciful, but insidious.

There seems a hope among Democrats and "Progressives" that impeaching Trump would end what they see as "America's Nationalist nightmare."

No chance.

9/11 infused a large segment of the American people with a renewed sense of patriotism and national pride. In most, that passion has NOT diminished.

Worse still, two protracted and costly wars that continued into even costlier and bloody rebuilding efforts, attempting to remake some Middle Eastern countries over in our image, eroded the faith of many Americans in the priorities of their establishment leadership.

Add to that, a government created sub-Prime mortgage crisis, in which BOTH political Parties got behind an effort to loosen traditional lending criteria by banks that required government guaranteeing those sub-Prime loans. The result was a massive mortgage meltdown and subsequent global financial crisis.

The result of this was a complete loss of faith in America's establishment. That's been borne out by the fact that not a single establishment politician has won the Presidency since 2004.

In 2008, an unknown, inexperienced Illinois State Senator, Barack Obama, who won a U.S. Senate seat via scandal, came out of nowhere to overtake establishment Democrat, Hillary Clinton, to go on to beat a hapless John McCain. President Obama held that office for two consecutive terms and in 2016, the early expectations were for a Jeb/Hillary showdown.

What happened?

First, the GOP base put 4 outsiders, Trump, Carson, Fiorina and Cruz ahead of every GOP establishment (GOPe) candidate.

The DNC then rigged their Primaries to make sure Hillary Clinton was corronated. That worked. Unfortunately for them, Hillary Clinton never had a cause, nor even a reason why she should've been elected President, EXCEPT "It's my turn."

2016 was supposed to have been "a return to normalcy," a return to establishment rule and an end to the Nationalism that was ascendant across the globe. After all, we'd just spent a decade and a half and trillions of dollars trying to put down the Nationalism that arose in the Arab-Muslim world in the form of its return to strict, Sharia-based Islam.

The next target was supposed to be the Euro Nationalism that had blossomed across that continent. Had Hillary been elected  the EU would've been bolstered and the hope was that Euro Nationalism would be put down.

Instead, Steve Bannon has been working with European leaders like Hungary's Viktor Orban, Austria's Sebastian Kurz and Poland's Andrzej Duda. In Brazil, a Leftist government failed and, as a result, the very Nationalist, pro free market Jair Bolsonaro has been elected there.

The hope among American Liberals and "Progressives" that "ending Trump should end this American Nationalism," is a false one.

It doesn't end. The same people who helped fund Trump here will continue providing financial and material support to Bolsonaro and the Euro Nationalists and there's nothing we can do about that.

I'd suggest "Abandoning all hope" of any "return" to America's once highly touted Anglo-American Globalism/One Worldism.

There's no turning back from the extreme and growing polarization gripping this country, so long as the Left insists on trying to revive a dead Globalism/One Worldism.

"THIS is NOT a Midterm, It's a Re-Elect" (Steve Bannon)

.
.
Everything is at stake for both Globalists and Nationalists alike, in these 2018 Midterms. (https://youtu.be/q8BGvG3pPfo)

Steve Bannon is right, "This is NOT a Midterm, it's a Re-Elect!"

It's hard to put ANY faith at all in what you hear/read from the Corporate Globalist media. Their polls, like their "news reports" are all too often fictionalized.

That's why Conservatives, Libertarians and Nationalists of all stripes MUST ignore the noise and get out and vote, November 6th...AND, if possible, to DONATE.

Today, a little over fifty days from Election Day, the Senate looks more likely, than not to remain in GOP hands, with only 8 seats in contention, with FL, AZ, ND, IN UT & MO looking good for the GOP, and NJ & TX, surprisingly both tossups.

West Virginia and Montana are also very tight races.

In the House, there are allegedly 39 seats that are up for grabs. Most of those in traditionally Red areas.

Will the Democrats be able to pull enough of those out to win back the House?

The GOP absolutely needs the Senate, but as Steve Bannon says, "Losing the House would effectively ground the Trump Presidency to a halt."

What can you do if you live in a reliably Red, or Blue district?

First, you can DONATE.

Money wins elections, because money sways votes.

You can also volunteer. Look around for nearby contests that might be close and, if you have some time, volunteer.

Florida is leaning Red, and NJ is very close, with Billionaire, former Marine, Bob Hugin putting heavy pressure on the vulnerable Bob Menendez. In Missouri, Claire McCaskill has never been more vulnerable and now, supposedly trails Josh Hawley in the polls.

We SHOULD NOT TRUST these media polls.

2016 was a shocking upset that put a political outsider in the White House. That’s a BIG problem for our multinational conglomerates, international banks and their bought & paid for political-media class. It is NOT A PROBLEM for average citizens, either Democrat, nor Republican.

Bannon has been freed to sell Nationalism in Europe and around the world and he's been doing that very effectively.

There are NO "globalist interests," for any average working people. A Nationalist outcome WILL NOT harm you, Left, or Right.

It would almost certainly bolster the stock markets, strengthen the USD and lead to more balanced trade deals that will help both European and American workers.

In short, the Globalist agenda is NOT for you.

You have NOTHING to lose if the EU implodes, the Euro crashes and America's Globalist political-media class is effectively replaced.

The same can't be said if the Anglo-American Globalist agenda is revived.

2016 was a shock, but 2018 is THE fight. Winning means keeping BOTH Houses of Congress.

Winning means real...longterm change.
.

Our Global Awakening...And the False Claim of "The Failure of Democracy"

George Carlin

Many have suggested, that in one sense, the last election was "A failure of democracy," BECAUSE "the common man chose Trump."

What it proves is that we DON'T HAVE a democracy. The choice in 2016 was between two extremely flawed candidates. Hillary's a monster and Trump is an unworthy champion of the Nationalism sweeping the globe, though a champion of that movement, he is, right now. BOTH were effectively put in place by political Parties owned and run by various multinational conglomerates. Only the logos that own them differ between Democrats and Republicans. George Carlin WASN'T kidding and he WAS right when he spoke of "the owners of America" (https://youtu.be/QT0OJEFlq7A)

Yes, to a degree, Trump, a lifelong NY Democrat hijacked the GOP, but that vehicle, that Party, is STILL owned by Internationalist interests.

That "failure of democracy" argument is what's behind the inane call to make America less a Republic and more of a democracy.

The TRUTH is that it's pure democracy that brought down Rome. That's why all of America's Founders reviled pure democracy with Ben Franklin defining it as, "Five wolves and a sheep, deciding on what's for dinner."

Mob rule/pure democracy has been a very destructive force throughout history. The idea of "rule by the common man," sounds noble, but it hasn't worked out well in practice.

What we're really witnessing today, is a transition, and an important one.

The Anglo-American Globalism that our political-media class trumpets is actually a Neo-Colonialism that seeks to pave over mankind's disparate and diverse cultures and heritages.

Nationalism began sweeping the world with the pan-Asian movement, followed by the Jihadist movement, or traditional Islamic movement, which was, at heart, an anti-Western movement resulting from the forced Westernization of the Arab Middle East and North Africa.

It's an irony then, that the West would be the last place to turn toward this new Nationalism.

Europe because of the mass Muslim migration that's brought on a clash of moralities - Sharia Law demands the death penalty for apostates (those who leave Islam), gays and adulteresses and a 3rd class citizenship called dhimmitude on non-Muslims - has been late to the movement, the USA, even later.

For the West, BREXIT was just the first symptom, followed by the raft of Nationalist leaders from May to Macron to Kurz, across Europe.

Trump was America's BREXIT.

There's no turning back...and decent people SHOULDN'T want to.

At heart, Anglo-American Globalism is a movement that seeks to, in effect, eradicate the diversity of mankind. It truly is a racist, Colonialist movement...unworthy of America.

What we're seeing today is a great awakening. Mankind's differences are OK....in fact, more than OK, they're absolutely necessary.