Monday, July 22, 2019

Napoleon Bonaparte...

Image result for Napoleon Bonaparte
Napoleon Bonaparte

Napoleon Bonaparte, like many great leaders was also a bit of a cynical philosopher.

Here are some of his more interesting quotes;

"The surest way to remain poor is to be an honest man."
(SAD, but that's always been true)

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
(I think Alexander the Great said something similar...or should have)

"If you want a thing done well, do it yourself."
(I think Jesus said the same thing too...or should have)

"Stupidity is no handicap in politics."
(Yup, STILL true today)

"The people to fear are not those who disagree with you, but those who disagree with you and are too cowardly to let you know."
(So, Napoleon hated sneaky bastards too)

"History is a set of lies agreed upon."
(YES...a set of lies/exaggerations written by the victors)

"Ability is nothing without opportunity."
(You have to be in the RIGHT place at the RIGHT time)

"Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever."

He was a brilliant man. No wonder he came close to conquering all of Europe.

Plus...he has a very nice pastry dessert named after small feat! Think about it, who was Eclair, Cream Puff, or Petit Four?

"Mostly UNTRUE???"


Many "Progressives" bristle when it's said that, "ONLY one political Party has consistently tabled bills that would lower the age of consent, decriminalize certain deviant sex acts and protect pedophiles....and YES, sadly that's the Democrats."

However, that is undeniably true.

While Red Alabama looks to mandate chemical castration for pedarists, many Blue state Legislatures look to lower, or eliminate age of consent laws.

As an example, California's Democrat legislature passed a bill, SB-145 that some have charged would, "protect pedophiles."

Snopes called the charge that SB-145 was a "pro-pedophile bill" "MOSTLY UNTRUE."


Well, existing California law permits individuals convicted of having non-forcible vaginal intercourse with a minor (within certain age parameters) to seek discretionary relief in court from automatically having to register as sex offenders. SB-145 extends that exception to people convicted of having non-forcible oral or anal sex with a minor.

While SB-145 wouldn't shield anyone from the requirement of registering as a sex offender, it would leave that decision, in "eligible cases," to the discretion of the presiding judge.

There were two ways to go with SB-145, one would be to look at the existing exception as wrong, but they chose the other...EXPANDING that exception and they just happened to expand it in a way that permits favor.

FACT is the charge against California's SB-145 is actually Mostly TRUE.

Many have argued that, "age of consent laws were much lower, or non-existent in the 19th Century."

Yes, we've evolved from the days when farm families Married off daughters as young as 14 so a large farm family could be groomed.

Today we do not enforce contracts for those under 18. They are considered not to have developed adult judgment. That's the primary reason for modern age of consent laws.

With most of the media leaning Left, they have generally backed the Democrat's position on the matter.

Often outlets take issue with the few cases where 18 y/o boys are charged as sex offenders for sexual relations with their 16 y/o girlfriends, as this article does (…/legislating-teen-sex-age-consent-law…/). Many, like this article are written by women, so as to make the appearance of males looking to lower the age of consent less obvious.

More telling is that even in the above article, Martha Kempner had to acknowledge that, "Now, in fairness, neither of these boys went to jail just for having sex with an underage girl, there were aggravating circumstances – one punched his girlfriend’s father and both violated judges’ orders to stay away from the girls."

Oh yes, there's all that, which hardly induces much sympathy for her lament that, "While the young men were teenagers themselves, at 18 the law considered them adults, whereas their girlfriends at 14 and 15 were under the legal age of consent."

SHOCKER! Law protects 14 and 15 y/o girls from sex with adults!

Yes, the age of consent is 18.
Again, there are two possible solutions to this, one would be raising the age of consent to 20, or 21, the other is lowering, or eliminating the age of consent.

Why reflexively argue for the latter?

Why even take issue at all. Most states treat males under 21, with younger girlfriends differently than those over 21...UNLESS they slug Dad, violate court orders, or transport a minor across state lines and such.

Anyone can plainly see the differeence in moral stances. Conservative Alabama looks to mandate chemical castration for pedarists (…/alabama-lawmakers-pass-bill…/story…), while Liberal Cali looks to broaden the "exceptions" surrounding sex with minors (…/bill-aims-to-en…/amp/…).

That's why the charge against "Progressives," as being "pedophile friendly" is actually Mostly TRUE.

What a Waste...

Bodycam footage released by a Wisconsin police department shows officers engaged in a gun battle with 47-year-old Ruben Houston last month

This is a tough incident to consider, especially because it brings up many other uncomfortable issues.

THIS incident SHOULD give people...especially "Liberal/Progressive" people pause for thought.

Ruben Houston was thought to be having a seizure on a bus on May 15th, 2019 but it turned out to be an overdose.

Police and Firefighters arrived on scene and Narcan was delivered.

Houston remained unconscious after the first dose of Narcan and required a second dose. He told the 1st responders that he'd taken some of his wife's morphine.

After that, things went down hill quickly, as Houston refused further medical treatment, but Wisconsin law requires an unconscious patient be brought in for observation.

Things escalated from there (see video within article) and Police bodycam footage released by the Appleton, Wisconsin Police Department shows officers engaged in a gun battle with the 47-year-old Ruben Houston last month. Officer Paul Christensen and Sgt. Christopher Biese exchanged shots with the Wausau resident on May 15th, outside of Appleton's downtown transit center.

Christensen was wounded, along with a bystander, and both were later released from the hospital.

However, Appleton firefighter Mitchell Lundgaard, 36, was shot and died as a result of his injuries at a hospital.

Worse still, Ruben Houston turns out to have been a career criminal and longtime drug abuser. Houston’s criminal record shows convictions for firearms possession, drug possession and other felonies dating to 1990. Other charges included fleeing an officer in 1990; robbery with a dangerous weapon in 1991 in Milwaukee County; and possession of a firearm in 1996, also in Milwaukee, according to the Post-Crescent. He served at least two stints in federal prison.

This begs the ethical question of whether simply withholding such extreme recovery measures based on a person's criminal background is the right way to go in such cases.

It's not as though we haven't broached that ethical question already.

When Ralph Northam (Governor of VA) recently responded to NBC Washington’s Julie Carey's question about whether he supported a bill proposed by Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran (D), which would allow abortions - up to the moment of birth, he answered; “In this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam said. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” (…/virginia-governor-describes-how-p…)

So, the Governor clearly said that a baby born healthy and alive could be “kept comfortable” and then “resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired” – the implication being that the baby could be left to die if the family decided they did not want to keep their child.

THAT is currently the Democrat standard ("Abortion until birth"), so, we agree in essence, that no life is sacred.

That said, the rest is entirely logical; such life and death decisions are legal and ethical.

For those who support "Abortion Until Birth," then it obviously follows that other such life/death decisions are legitimate, as well, like refusing to deliver Narcan to someone who has overdosed, but has a violent felony history.

It's Official: Democrats Debunk Biology...

Image result for Nancy Pelosi

According to reports, The Democrats passed a bill (HR-5) amending the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make “sexual orientation and gender identity” protected characteristics under federal anti-discrimination law.

Among other things, HR-5 would force public schools to expand female athletic teams to include biological males who identify as transgender girls, thereby rebuking the historic segregation of sports by gender.

Republican Florida Rep. Greg Steube introduced a last-minute amendment to the bill that would have preserved Title IX’s protections of female athletic teams, but Democrats rejected it."

The bill passed 236-173, with unanimous Democratic support.

There was strong Republican opposition. Republican Arizona Rep. Debbie Lesko warned in an op-ed Thursday, “People need to wake up. This radical bill is going to totally eliminate women’s and girls sports."

Fellow Republican Missouri Rep. Vicky Hartzler and a half-dozen other House Republicans held a press conference Thursday in support of traditional Title IX and in opposition to HR-5.

“Congress enacted Title IX to provide equal opportunities for women in education and sports. All this is erased under H.R. 5,” Hartzler said at the press conference.

According to the linked article, "Three former elite female athletes, Doriane Coleman, Martina Navratilova and Sanya Richards-Ross, warned that the Equality Act would wreak havoc on women’s sports in an April 29 Washington Post op-ed.

“The legislation would make it unlawful to differentiate among girls and women in sports on the basis of sex for any purpose. For example, a sports team couldn’t treat a transgender woman differently from a woman who is not transgender on the grounds that the former is male-bodied,” the former athletes wrote.

“Yet the reality is that putting male- and female-bodied athletes together is co-ed or open sport. And in open sport, females lose,” the three women warned.

"House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a Democrat from New York, insisted the bill wouldn’t put female athletes at a disadvantage.

“Many states have sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination laws, and all of them still have women’s sports. Arguments about transgender athletes participating in sports in accordance with their gender identity having competitive advantages have not been borne out,” Nadler said at a April 2 hearing on the bill."

Thankfully, for women's sports, it's extremely unlikely HR-5 will be passed by this Senate...but it shows where their heads are at.

Rep. Crenshaw Grills Google Executive Over LEAKED Email Published by Ver...




Ben Crenshaw Strips Google Naked, Spanks Them, Then Paints Them Blue...OUCH!!!

BOTH Conservatives and Traditional Americans should boycott Google & YouTube and seek out alternative platforms like Bitchute (

Frederica Wilson Wants Those Who Make Fun of Elected Officials Prosecited...

Image result for frederica wilson
Frederica Wilson (D-FL)

When did we start electing the illiterate?

The very FIRST Amendment to the Constitution, the 1st enumerated Right in the Bill of Rights is freedom of expression!

If you didn't even read that far, you've got no business in any elected office.

Bill DeBlasio Wants to be Your President?

Andrew Cuomo, Bill de Blasio and Luis Alvarez

He couldn't even be my latex salesman (Seinfeld reference)...

BOTH Bill DeBlasio AND Andy Cuomo skipped the Funeral for 9/11 Hero Detective Luis Alvarez Wednesday (…/de-blasio-cuomo-no-shows-at-9-11-hero…/)

Neither upholds the basic traditions of their office...but at least Cuomo isn't running for President.
DeBlasio IS!

AND...he isn't even fit to be your latex salesman (

Big Bird Flops in Miami...

Image result for Bill DeBlasio
Bill DeBlasio

Some people can't help themselves. Bill DeBlasio seems to be one of them.

After quoting the infamous Ernesto Che Guevara, New York's Mayor had to apologize for quoting the mass murdering Communist at an event in Miami.

"I did not know the phrase I used in Miami today was associated with Che Guevara & I did not mean to offend anyone who heard it that way. I certainly apologize for not understanding that history," the Democratic presidential hopeful posted on Twitter.

"I only meant it as a literal message to the striking airport workers that I believed they would be victorious in their strike," he wrote.

De Blasio was addressing striking workers at Miami International Airport when he shouted in Spanish, "Hasta la victoria, siempre!" which translates to "Until victory, always!" -- a slogan coined by the polarizing Argentine-born Cuban revolutionary..."

Ironically enough, as Cuba’s Minister of Industries in the 1960s, Guevara also said this; “By no means can Cuban workers go on strike! Cuban workers must adjust to life in a collectivist-socialists order!”

He also often referred to the United States as the “great enemy of mankind.”

For his part, Guevara actually begged the Soviet Union to nuke the U.S., specifically New York, Washington D.C. and/or Los Angeles. He famously said; “Against those hyenas there is no option but extermination...if the missiles had remained in Cuba, we would have fired them against the heart of the U.S. including New York City!”

Peach of guy, Bill!

Given the Mayor's own personal musings about "most New Yorkers wanting the Socialism that would dictate where people lived and what rent they paid," it's hard to believe this was just a gaffe, but giving him the benefit of the doubt only makes stupidity the other option.

Hardly a ringing endorsement for office. "Hey, I'm not homicidal, just stupid!"

Hmmmm, catchy, but that wouldn't get my vote...

An Interesting, BUT Frightening Video - Why Africa's Future Is Colonial (NEW)




A Fascinating Video...
Is Africa doomed?

Very possibly so.

Is Europe doomed, as well?

It might be and IF that's so, mankind is doomed.

This video from "Way of the World" (WotW) faces some VERY uncomfortable truths.

Foremost among them, the most basic of all truths, "We are NOT all the same."

The blunt exchange between the Chinese man and the African man is extremely sad, but all too true.

With Matteo Salvini leading the EU, Europe MUST embark on saving itself.

As for Sub-Saharan Africa, it must find it's own way...

What's Behind the Blue Bell Ice Cream Tampering?


So far, at least two people have been caught tampering with (licking) unopened Blue Bell ice cream containers in stores, then placing them back on the freezer shelves.

The culprits COULD face up to 20 years in prison. (…/woman-who-lick…/amp/…). Tampering is a serious crime, since the Tylenol scare of the 1980s. Licking a product can spread germs/disease and COULD BE considered a form of "Bio Terror," by a zealous prosecutor.

It also highlights a brand ("Blue Bell") in a very negative way.

I didn't know that any such containers weren't wrapped in security film, the way Breyers products are, but that's obviously a problem now.

You have to wonder whether this is really just viral idiocy, OR corporate shenanigans.

Another thing it highlights is how dumb a lot of people still are. In most stores (virtually all, today) you're on security's CCTV every minute you're in that store. The resolution is good and you're easily caught once on film.

Personally, I LOVE this ubiquitous surveillance!

Hmmmmm, how long before Blue Bell increases its packaging security?

How long before Breyers and others use their already existing packaging security as a selling point?

Reason #4,784,386 WHY I LOVE the Ubiquitous Post-9/11 Surveillance State...

.Image result for Oklahoma City Veteran attacked

Today, EVERYTHING'S on film. Virtual

Our every public move is on video.

Once that was universally considered "creepy," now it's become universally accepted.

Outside our homes, we have no legal expectation of privacy. This ubiquitous and increasing surveillance has solved many crimes, debunked others (hello Jussie!) and cleared many innocents who've been wrongly accused (hello again, Jussie).

In a recent attack on a disabled Veteran in Oklahoma City, the entire episode was caught on video (…/police-investigating-alleged-assault-o…/…).

It's said that the alleged attacker made a derogatory statement to the Vet before the attack. ANYONE besmirching a Veteran should be punished severely. In a better world, they'd be beaten unmercifully before Police arrived, if only to "soften them up."

This was clearly a "hate crime," so it's good it was caught on video.

A Warning From SIX Decades Ago - Aldous Huxley interviewed by Mike Wallace : 1958 (Full)




In this 1958 interview with Mike Wallace, writer, Aldous Huxley explains why he believed, even then that the world he envisioned in his dystopian novel, "Brave New World" is just around the corner. (

Here he discusses how overpopulation and technology had already increased the role of government and limited personal freedoms in the West.

His view was that the organization most prepared to fill the breach was the Commjnist Party, which already had a presence in every country around the world.

He also noted that Communism's biggest enemy at the time, the Roman Catholic Church, in opposing birth control, was unwittingly fueling overpopulation and the conditions most likely to bring about global Communism.

He also touched on, in a circumspect manner (given television's reliance on ad revenues)the role of mass communications and mass propaganda, that has given the few conglomerates that control most of the world's media, the ability to control both access to information and what views are "acceptable" and which ones aren't.

This capacity for mass manipulation has only increased and been honed over the intervening years.

As Huxley notes, the coming authoritarian dictatorship will be nothing like the ones of the early 20th Century, the coming one will control thought and opinion through the access to and manipulation of information. In that way people will not only support the authoritarian structure, but will feel they need it.

It's a poignant interview even today...
American Ideas Click Here!