Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Friday, October 31, 2008

From The; “I No Theeenk That Mean What You Theeenk It Mean” Department...








FROM Ace; “MSM Claims 2008 Will See the Lowest Arctic Ice Cover In History; Arctic Might Actually Be Clear of All Ice!!!”

Actual Empirical Evidence: 2008 Arctic Ice Cover More than 25% Greater than 2007!

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/275808.php#275808



OK, I get it, by “the lowest Arctic ice covering ever” they mean “25% greater than 2007’s” AND BY the Arctic might be clear of all ice,” they mean, “the Arctic will have one its deepest ice coverings ever.” Makes perfect sense, when you put it that way.

I get it, “Ix Nay on the Tic-Arc-re.”


H/T Ace of Spades HQ
.
.
UPDATE: From the Nature Conservancy's own Webpage; "Only 18 percent of survey respondents strongly believe that climate change is real, human-caused and harmful." So, global warming skeptics are the MAJORITY and not a minority.

Friday, May 16, 2008

The Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change







WoW! Over 800 scientists signed onto the Manhattan Declaration (in its entirety below). Bet you didn’t see that in the NY Times, or on ABC, CBS, CNN or NBC!

We seem to be at an impasse here, with the Luddite and anti-Capitalist forces claiming “only government scientists can be believed, as private sector scientists get their funding from Capitalist, pro-Big Energy sources,” while Capitalists and anti-global warming hysteria folks claim, “Only private sector scientists can be trusted, as government-backed scientists get their funding through government grants, and thus are shills for the pro-public and anti-private sector concerns.”

Enjoy:

"Global warming is not a global crisis
We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;
Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ?consensus? among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

Hereby declare:

That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity's real and serious problems.

That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.

That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individualcitizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation, and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend;

That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as "An Inconvenient Truth."

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/manhattan_declaration.html

Monday, June 25, 2007

More Americans Worry About the Effects of Terrorism Than About the Effects of Global Warming






.

That makes sense.

The effects of terrorism are imminent and all too real, the effects of global warming are unclear, especially since the Reid Bryson, known as the father of scientific climatology, called global warming a bunch of hooey.

The poll results, in response to the question, “Over the coming decades, which do you think will pose a more serious threat to the world—the effects of climate change and global warming or the effects of global terrorism,” were;

Effects of global terrorism 52%

Effects of climate change and global warming 28%

Equal effects 15%

Don’t know 4%

That’s puts the majority of Americans at oddss with Al Gore who in November 2005 said, "I don’t want to diminish the threat of terrorism at all, it is extremely serious, but on a long-term global basis, global warming is the most serious problem we are facing."

Friday, February 9, 2007

Not again!...More Global Warming Games


Heard the one about “BushCo paying off climatologists to change their views on global warming,” or “the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) paying climatologists $10,000 (from Exxon-Mobil) to change their views.”

Whooops!

It’s a LIE...a smear campaign cooked up by the folks at Greenpeace.

They’ve been peddling this scam for months and finally hooked and reeled in the folks at the UK Guardian, from there it was taken up by the British Independent, before it jumped “the pond” to the WaPo and CNN Money!

According to the Wall Street Journal, "What AEI did was send a letter to several leading climate scientists asking them to participate in a symposium that would present a "range of policy prescriptions that should be considered for climate change of uncertain dimension." Some of the scholars asked to participate, including Steve Schroeder of Texas A& M, are climatologists who believe that global warming is a major problem."

Exxon's director of its Washington office, Lauren Kerr has said that "none of us here had ever heard of this AEI climate change project until we read about it in the London newspapers."


Even so the policy of commissioning such research is also standard practice at NASA and other government agencies and at liberal groups such as the Pew Charitable Trusts, which have among them spent billions of dollars attempting to link fossil fuels to global warming.

Worse still, several members of the U.S. Senate have taken these reports on face value without ever even contacting the AEI to vet them. Yesterday Senators Bernie Sanders, Patrick Leahy, Dianne Feinstein and John Kerry sent a letter to AEI President, Mr. DeMuth complaining that "should these reports be accurate," then "it would highlight the extent to which moneyed interests distort honest scientific and public policy discussions. . . . Does your donors' self-interest trump an honest discussion over the well-being of the planet?"

According to the WSJ, "Every member of AEI's board of directors was graciously copied on the missive. We're told the Senators never bothered to contact AEI about the veracity of the reports, and by repeating the distortions, these four Democratic senators, wittingly or not, gave credence to falsehood."

Currently Exxon-Mobil is demanding a full retraction from the Independent.




Wednesday, January 31, 2007

UN to Downgrade Estimates of Man's Role in Global Warming!


The Sunday London Telegraph reports that when the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) releases its upcoming report this February, they will downgrade their estimates of man's role in global warming by 25%. The Telegraph says that the report will reduce its estimate of man's role in global warming by 25 percent. However, the IPCC will still project global temperatures to climb by 4.5 C during the next century and rising sea levels, albeit by half the amount -- 17 inches instead of 34 inches by 2100 -- forecast by the IPCC's 2001 report.


The report will also claim that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have indeed continued to climb over the past five years but that the overall human effect on global warming since the industrial revolution has been dampened by cooling caused by particulate matter and aerosol sprays, which accumulate in the upper atmosphere and reflect heat from the sun.


The UN will explain that the findings are the result of more refined estimates based on new data rather than "a reduction in the risk posed by global warming." The reduced anthropologic impact on climate change is expected to produce ammunition for newly-emboldened global warming skeptics who've recently been beleagured by proponents of anthropomorphic global warming.


Climate change has occured throughout human history. Historical records show that grapes grew in England as recently as 650 years ago, requiring much warmer temperatures than we have now. Global temperatures have been estimated to have been even warmer than that 2,000 years ago, during the early years of the first Millenium AD.


In between that point, especially during the Middle Ages Europe's temperatures sunk to some of the lowest in recorded human history.


Check out the good news for yourself;


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/12/10/nclimate10.xml
American Ideas Click Here!