Showing posts with label Judge Roy Pearson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judge Roy Pearson. Show all posts

Monday, June 25, 2007

Liberal Redistributionist Loses His “Missing Pants” Case













.

Roy L. Pearson, the Liberal, Democrat redistributionist, who sees business as “the enemy,” lost his ridiculous law suit against Washington D.C.’s Custom Cleaners yesterday.

In deciding the case, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that "A reasonable consumer would not interpret 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' to mean that a merchant is required to satisfy a customer's unreasonable demands" or to agree to demands that the merchant would have reasonable grounds for disputing, the judge wrote.

Judge Bartnoff further ordered Mr. Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung, estimated to be slightly over $1,000. A decision on their legal costs, a significantly larger sum, will be held later.

Pearson, an administrative law judge, originally sought $67 million from the Chungs, claiming they lost a pair of trousers from a blue and maroon suit, then tried to give him a pair a pair of charcoal gray pants that he said were not his.

Judge Bartnoff wrote that Pearson failed to prove that the pants the dry cleaner tried to return were not the pants he taken in for alterations.

Pearson later dropped demands for damages related to the pants and focused his claims on signs (“Satisfaction Guaranteed”) in the shop, which have since been removed.

Conservatives would do well to make Roy Pearson the face of the Kos-Huffpo-MoveOn Liberal nexis.

Saturday, May 12, 2007

A Judge Only John Edwards Could Love





A vile administrative law judge from Washington, D.C. has become the poster boy for lawsuit abuse. Administrative Law Judge, Roy Pearson is suing a local Dry Cleaners for a whopping $67 MILLION for (gulp!) misplacing a pair of his pants...his “favorite pants,” from Pearson’s perspective.

How did a lawyer, turned judge come up with such an absurd number?

Well according to Through the Magnifying Glass, “Pearson went to the law books and citing the District of Columbia's consumer protection laws, he "claims" he's entitled to $1,500 per violation, PER DAY!

“So how did he come up with $67 million for damages and legal fees?

“$1,500 for each violation, each day during which the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign and another sign promising "Same Day Service" was up in the store - more than 1,200 days.

“Then he's multiplying each violation by three because he's suing Jin and Soo Chung and their son.
<
He also wants $500,000 in emotional damages.
Plus $542,500 in legal fees.

“And he wants $15,000 for 10 years' worth of weekend car rentals (for forcing him to drive to another dry cleaner store).”

http://blog.case.edu/james.chang/2007/05/02/the_67_million_dollar_pants


Well, the good news is that Pearson’s law license is being reviewed and his picture no longer appears on D.C.’s list of OAH (Office of Administrative Hearings) judges.

If this guy winds up losing his judgship AND his law license for abusing the legal system, that would certainly be poetic justice.
American Ideas Click Here!