Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Holder. Show all posts

Friday, February 21, 2014

Poor CNN....ALL They're Left With Are Curtis Reeves and Willie Noble!


Carol Costello  (above)          AND            Erin Burnett  (below)





What are the race mongers at CNN and MSNBC going to do now?!

In the wake of the “Loud Music Shooting” in which white, middle aged software developer Michael Dunn killed young, black Jordan Davis, they were able to attempt to turn an ugly incident between an adult jerk and a bunch of teen jerks into a racial incident...the upcoming major national crimes offer no such possibilities.

DRATS!

All they have left right now are Curtis Reeves and Willie Noble. What will Carol Costello, Erin Burnett and the other race mongers do for an encore?

I guess they’re going to have to wait...for the "right crime.”

And given the stats over race and crime (young black males committing a widely disproportionate amount of the violent crime in America), it could be a long and painful wait.

Seriously, do I HAVE TO go over these stats on race and crime again? Stats, by the way, which I gleaned by watching CNN!

OK, I will;


— "Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks." Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic.

— “Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime.

— "Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery."

— “Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse.”

So once again, what do these crime statistics tell us? Merely that “the real repository of racism in America — manifest in violent interracial assault, rape and murder is NOT to be found in the white community, but the African-American community. In almost all interracial attacks, whites are the victims, not the victimizers.”

In the case of Curtis Reeves, a white former cop who shot another man over texting in a movie theater (claiming the guy throwing popcorn at him constituted a “threat”), he unfortunately shot another white man.

In the case of Willie Noble of Arkansas, a black man who shot a teen after the group the teen was with egged his car, he sadly also shot...another African-American.

What were these guys thinking?!

Don’t they know that news-entertainers like Carol Costello, Melissa Harris-Perry and Erin Burnett live for inter-racial violence?

Do these guys even care ONE BIT how their callous disregard for ratings impacts these hosts?

OK, in the case of Mr. Noble, there’s little he could’ve done. If he’d shot a white teen, well that would've been no big deal to the likes of Ms. Costello or Ms. Burnett. In fact, they’d probably have framed their stories around the white teen “deserving it,” or “bringing it on herself,” all the while arranging for carefully chosen guests to undermine their own arguments on behalf of the traditional media meme – “black victim, white abuser.”

BUT Mr. Reeves really messed up! WHY couldn't he have targeted a black texter? Or, absent that, WHY couldn't he have missed the actual texter and shot a black theater-goer by mistake...even then, I’m sure Carol and Erin could’ve argued that somehow he meant to shoot the black victim, because after all, he’s both white and a former cop (a/k/a “racist”).

Seriously, I DO feel bad that things have broken so badly for Ms. Costello and Ms. Burnett. They’re going to have to largely ignore these two most recent national crimes, or resort to excoriating guns because there’s just no race angle to play here.

Wait a minute! I know! They could instead focus on Conrad Alvin Barrett (here’s CNNs own report: http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/26/justice/texas-knockout-charge/) the WHITE Texas teen who punched a 79 year-old BLACK man playing “the knockout game.” Barrett remains the ONE person the grossly incompetent Eric Holder DoJ has charged with a “hate crime” over this virulently racist “game.”

I’m glad I thought of that. I hope it’s NOT too late and I sure hope that Ms. Burnett and Ms. Costello get the memo so they don’t have to suffer those nasty race-obsession withdrawal symptoms.
.
.
.
Post Script: The sad thing is that you cannot possibly shame these smug, sanctimonious, race-obsessed people because they are convinced they're motivated by righteousness. Unfortunately Hitler, Mao, Stalin and virtually every serial killer that ever lived have all felt they were motivated by some form of "righteousness" too. I KNOW all his, but I STILL can't help noticing it and finding the smell repugnant.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Mandating Racism




Eric Holder


Eric Holder’s DoJ has been fighting charges of gross incompetence since about the time Holder took that office; from colluding to attempt to bury a legitimate voting rights case brought by whites in Mississippi (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/us/politics/11voting.html?_r=0), to dropping the charges in the New Black Panther voter intimidation case in Philly (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case), to helping activists in New York find a judge willing to scuttle that city’s highly effective “Stop & Frisk” program, to fighting AGAINST merit and standards for Police and Fire Departments across the country.

The Holder DoJ has virtually been a singular bastion that has steadfastly held to the “disparate impact” doctrine that’s increasingly lost favor in most legal circles.

Most recently, education experts across the country have decried a new memo from the Departments of Justice and Education that instructs public schools throughout the country to cease punishing disruptive students if they fall into certain racial categories, such as black or Hispanic.

The letter, released on Wednesday (1-8-2014), states that it’s a violation of federal law for schools to punish certain races more than others, even if those punishments stem from completely neutral rules. For example, equal numbers of black students and white students should be punished for tardiness, even if black students are more often tardy than white students.

The most relevant section of the letter reads:

“Schools also violate Federal law when they evenhandedly implement facially neutral policies and practices that, although not adopted with the intent to discriminate, nonetheless have an unjustified effect of discriminating against students on the basis of race.

Examples of policies that can raise disparate impact concerns include policies that impose mandatory suspension, expulsion, or citation (e.g., ticketing or other fines or summonses) upon any student who commits a specified offense — such as being tardy to class, being in possession of a cellular phone, being found insubordinate, acting out, or not wearing the proper school uniform.”

Andrew Coulson, director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute, said the letter’s policies, if implemented, would actually harm black children, by making the classrooms they inhabit “more chaotic.”

“The kinds [of kids] who just want to be free to learn in peace, who are not disruptive, have their education injured by the disruptive kids who remain in the classroom,” Coulson said. “And since African American kids are more often assigned to schools like that, they’ll be the ones most hurt.”

Frederick Hess, director of education policy at the American Enterprise Institute, described the letter as “troubling,” and an attempt to intimidate schools into initiating bad policy.

“As best I can tell, they are telling schools that even if you have policies that are clearly neutral, that are clearly evenhanded, that are clearly designed to create safe environments for students and educators, DOJ still might come down on you like a ton of bricks.”

There is absolutely nothing in that directive that looks to help black or Hispanic students, quite the reverse. That’s NOT my issue...I DON’T much care about why a black, like Holder, would institute policies that would harm younger blacks...I have no interest in that. I DO have an interest in the abuse of law, the abuse and violation of “equal protection under the law” and “equality of opportunity” that the flawed policies derived from the poisoned tree of “disparate impact” generate.


Tuesday, January 14, 2014

FINALLY!…They’ve Charged a Knock-Out Game Player With a HATE CRIME…Yup....he's WHITE!



Eric Holder



The hopelessly inept Holder DoJ FINALLY stepped up and charged a vicious teen who assaulted an elderly man with a hate crime!

A Texas man, Conrad Alvin Barrett, 27 was charged with a hate crime after brutally punching a 79 y/o man in South Texas.

Of course, as it turns out, Conrad Alvin Barrett is white and his elderly victim is black. The media seems focused on this particular crime because it goes against one of the major media narratives about the Knockout Game that it is being played mostly by groups of black youths against white and Jewish victims.”

Funny story...OK, not so funny...THIS is, to date, virtually a singular event, in an astounding 99+% of the cases the perps are black and the victims white, and predominantly Jewish in major urban areas.


Another twist in this particular saga is that Conrad Barrett’s attorney is suggesting that his client is suffering from bipolar disorder and thus isn’t responsible for his actions. Hey! Why not affluenza? I mean if this punk doesn’t live in a trailer park, why not throw that bullshit against the wall as well.

White Knockout Game Player
Conrad Alvin Barrett

Bottom line, Conrad Alvin Barrett SHOULD be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Texas did that with Shawn Berry, Lawrence Russell Brewer and John King – James Byrd’s killers. Two were sentenced to death BEFORE Texas had a “hate crimes” law.

My own issue with “hate crimes” is that ALL violent crimes are motivated by hate, so such crimes, in effect, claim that racial or ethnic hatred is somehow worse than class envy or other kinds of hatred. That is clearly NOT the case and no one, to date, has ever made a compelling argument for that erroneous claim.

“Hate crimes” laws discount a black victim’s suffering at the hands of a black perp, and a white victim’s suffering at the hands of a white thug without ANY rationale for denying THESE victims “equality before the law.”

The best thing this case can do is to expose the incompetence and hair-brained malevolence of the Holder DoJ. THAT would be a very welcome development.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Eric Holder Refuses To Say "Radical Islam"



THIS says it ALL about Eric Holder's, and by extension, this administration's views on both the threat posed by radical Islam and "appropriate anti-terror policies." - To paraphrase a line from the flick Billy Madison; "What you've just said (Mr. Holder) is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
American Ideas Click Here!