Saturday, December 28, 2019

Multiculturalism is Anglo-American Globalism/One Worldism


Image result for Gay Byrne
Gay Byrne
.
.
Religion has been horribly abused for ages by the ignorant and dimwitted, ESPECIALLY the ignorant and dimwitted in GOVERNMENTS around the world.

It's intriguing to look at this ongoing, "Catholicism as sin" campaign (https://www.irishcentral.com/…/confessions-of-a-collapsed-d…). If you're Muslim, Sihk, or Hindu, you should find this especially interesting, as THIS is the new Colonialism and it's coming your way.

"Multiculturalism" is part and parcel of Anglo-American Globalism/One Worldism. "Welcome to the West and prepare to be fully Westernized." The Western Leftists don't believe any other cultures are viable, let alone valuable. This is the new, softer Colonialism, rooted in the condescending view that, "Inside every 3rd World wog is a proper Englishman trying to get out."

That view isn't just bigoted, that entire view is an expression of Western bigotry toward 'other'/lesser cultures and peoples. Yes, the Irish Catholics are part of that "other." That's part of the sales pitch to other unwanted belief systems.

I stopped believing in Catholicism at around 9, stopped going to Church by age 11. Today, I AM spiritual, just not religious.

As a result, today I'm equally skeptical of modern religions like Anglo-American Globalism/One Worldism and Cataclysmic Environmentalism.

As stifling and repressive as many ancient belief systems are, multiculturalism and Anglo-American Globalism/One Worldism are worse...way, WAY WORSE!

Where previous Colonizers sought to convert at the point of a gun and eradicate those who wouldn't comply, today's new Colonialists use mass media to shape/manipulate public opinion and "Colonize" minds.

It's a more insidious, dangerous and effective strategy.
.

The Difference Between UNETHICAL and ILLEGAL

.
.
.Image result for Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon

,
,
Jimmy Carter was almost certainly the worst (most incompetent and ineffective) post-WWII President, despite the fact that Carter was/is a great American.


Richard M. Nixon was actually one of the most effective Presidentsof that period, despite being a deeply flawed person.

Nixon was a largely amoral and unethical man, but he was an effective POTUS.

Oddly enough, Jimmy Carter was a very moral and highly ethical man, but a very ineffective POTUS.

Nixon opened up China to the West, started the EPA, signed Title IX into law, forged the SALT & ABM Treaties. UNFORTUNATELY he also instituted wage and price controls that worsened a weakening post-industrial economy, signed Affirmative Action's preferences and set asides into law and ended the compulsory Military Draft.

Paranoia aside, Nixon was a far more effective POTUS than LBJ, Carter, the Bush's Sr & Jr, Obama, even Reagan.

Carter's response to "Stagflation" (double digit inflation, unemployment and interest rates) was, "Oh well, I guess we're all gonna just have to tighten our belts." An attempted rescue of the hostages in Iran was aborted because the Helicopters wouldn't take off in a desert sand storm. He was mocked over his canoe apparently being attacked by a rabid beaver on a canoe trip.

Bill Clinton, like Richard Nixon, was also an amoral and unethical man. Clinton's sexual tryst was certainly "coercive," under existing laws, but I've always had an issue with such presumptive charges. A CEO having a liaison with an underling is not necessarily coercive. I think Due Process is vital. The person making the charge has the burden of proof. It's only "coercive" if it can be proven to be coercive.

Joe Biden got his goofy kid (Hunter) a position with Burisma (a Ukranian Oil & Gas company). He later boasted about threatening to withhold aid if a prosecutor investigating Burisma wasn't fired. He bragged that the Prosecutor was fired within 6 hours.

That's unethical, it's NOT technically illegal.

Likewise, Trump suggesting that the new Ukrainian President reopen the Burisma and Crowd Source investigations probably wasn't even unethical, as those investigations had already been reopened before his calls were made. It's certainly NOT illegal.

Many people use those two words unethical/illegal interchangeably. They are NOT synonyms. They are two vastly different concepts.

Many things that are UNETHICAL are not ILLEGAL.
.

Hate is a Contagious Disease That Reduces its Victims to Fools

.
.

Nearly 3/4s of a Century ago the world recoiled in horror at the targeted hatred the Nazis inflicted upon Jews and some other groups (Gypsies, etc.).

Of course, no generation has ever taken the right lessons from history, so why should we be expected to, today?

The dehumanizing of "the other" has continued unabated to the present day. Whether the targeted are Christians ("Christofascists"), Leftists ("Pinkos"/"Commies"), Conservatives ("Fascists"/"Oppressors"), or different ethnic groups ("the others"), far too many people fall prey to the SAME targeting of "others" as the Nazis did.

More troubling is that currently, it's allegedly "educated" (mostly miseducated) Westerners that are among the most prone to eagerly embrace this dehumanization and hatred of..."others."

Some stubbornly insist that, "Hating the 'haters' ISN'T illegitimate hate."

ALL hate is illegitimate. ALL hate is self destructive and corrosive to the spirit. Hate is so easily rationalized because such rationalizations are a comfort. It's comforting and preferable to see ourselves as "noble" and "good" and those we disagree with as "evil," just as it's disquieting to consider we may be wrong...or at least partly right and partly wrong and just as guilty of relishing such hatreds as those "others."

That's probably why, in the deeply polarized U.S. today, a seeming majority of people actively dehumanize and revile "the others," as "enemies."

GW Bush was reviled more than any previous POTUS up to that time. Though GW Bush, despite coming from a notorious family, was himself, by all accounts, a genuinely kind and gentle man and yet he was portrayed as a would-be dictator, as "McChimp," and as a man, who, "If elected, more black Churches will burn."

While President Obama suffered significantly less abuse than GW Bush, largely because the existing national media overwhelmingly supports those it perceives to be Liberal Democrats, he too was reviled by a large segment of the population, DESPITE mostly delivering GW's 3rd & 4th terms!

Ironically enough, while Barack Obama won while running on a promise of "Hope & Change," he quickly befriended the banksters he'd campaigned on punishing. He continued GW Bush's big Bank and Corporate bailouts, as well as supporting, even expanding the post 9/11 Surveillance State he'd campaigned against. He even presided over the largest expansion of American oil and natural gas in nearly a Century, with the Fracking Boom!

The current POTUS (Donald Trump) has actually delivered on that "Hope & CHANGE," at least for those who revile and oppose the existing, establishment political-media class.

Trump is far more despised, especially by the media than Bush and Obama combined were, BUT the real antipathy is reserved for those who support Trump.

The media's hatred is understandable, as they're part of this political-media class, fully owned by a consortium of international banks and multinational conglomerates, BUT the hatred from Americans who identify as "Democrats," is far less understandable. After all, Donald Trump himself, is a lifelong, NY Democrat who hijacked the GOP and he's governed as a traditional "JFK Democrat" - a tax-cutting, Nationalist, anti Collectivist.

Kennedy, much like Trump opposed a Jacob Javits-backed "Immigration Reform" bill, that had been first introduced in 1960 and again in 1962, a bill that he knew was designed to change the demographics of America. Like Trump, JFK liked and preferred America's traditional demographics.

Why ANY Democrat today opposes such a platform is, to say the least, puzzling.

The market economy has never failed America, while no form of Collectivism has ever worked anywhere in the world.

Moreover, Trump's done absolutely no harm, to date.

The radical Left has had to contort itself to things like defending border trespassers, which is especially bizarre considering that from January, 2009 until January, 2017 those same people loudly applauded a President who, from the start, boasted of being, "The Deporter-in-Chief." In fact, Barack Obama deported over 3 MILLION border trespassers over his first 3 years.

Donald Trump, by comparison, has deported just under 1 MILLION over his first 3 years.

Trump has governed like a traditional Kennedy Democrat and, ironically enough, has been pilloried by members of the Democrat Party, for those efforts!

Worse still, this polarization of the public along class and ideological lines bodes ominously for America. Amidst talk from both sides about "Civil War," we've seen actual skirmishes with hate groups like Antifa and some radical elements of the BLM movement primarily targeting women and the elderly, as the Black Hebrew Israelites targeted a group of schoolchildren from Covington Catholic earlier this year. Most ominous of all is that there is very little condemnation of such groups by "traditional Liberals."

There's far too much of THIS kind of nonsense today (https://youtu.be/Kb8uA97t6qU). This woman felt completely justified in assailing an older white (Jewish) gentleman who was minding his own business, drinking coffee in a Starbucks, while wearing a MAGA hat. She called him a "racist" and a "Nazi," and tried to get the rest of the customers to chase him out of the store. That didn't happen. In fact, the other customers turned on her.

In a hardly surprising move, NONE of those in the political-media class that gin up and legitimize such hate were there to defend her when she lost her job, over promoting the doxing of her victim.

Hate is a disease that turns ordinarily decent people into fools...and it's highly contagious.
.

Michael Bloomberg's "Tax the Poor" Plan...




























.
.
Yes, Mike Bloomberg supports taxing the poor a good deal more. He's an honest man.


Most of those who see government as "the solution," rather than the "problem," which it is, think the same way Bloomberg does, but are politically astute enough not to say it aloud.

Bloomberg DOESN'T mean raising payroll taxes, etc., he means taxing choices HE doesn't like. In Bloomy's view for instance, "Make sweets and sugary drinks more expensive and dumb, poor people won't buy as many and they may live longer."

The problem is that this view runs completely counter to individual liberty...which this nation's Constitution is predicated upon. It IS however, very much in line with the views that B.F. Skinner put forth in "Beyond Freedom and Dignity" (https://www.amazon.com/…/0872206270/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_U3…).

Michael Bloomberg is a pompous, arrogant "Nanny State" supporter.

In Bloomberg's and other Leftist's view, the poor need NEITHER freedom, nor dignity, they merely need government assistance.
.

Today's Shifting Ideological Sands...


Image result for Dan Cathy
Chic-Fil-A CEO Dan Cathy
.
.
A lot has been made of Chic-Fil-A's Dan Cathy switching that company's donation platform (halting donations to the Fellowship of Christian Athletes & the Salvation Army), which comes after nearly a decade of outreach to Steve Windmeyer, a gay activist with Campus Pride.

That SHOULDN'T have been surprising considering that Dan Cathy had reached out to a number of gay activists almost a decade ago. (https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_2564379).

Dan Cathy, like every American...every INDIVIDUAL, has the right to change his views and to donate to whom he pleases.

Now comes outrage on the Left after Mark Zuckerberg's "secret meeting" with Donald Trump and Pete Thiel.

Zuckerberg, like all extremely successful people strongly supports free enterprise and the market economy (https://www.theguardian.com/…/surprised-about-mark-zuckerbe…), just as do the vast majority of productive Americans.

As you'd expect, most such people, as well as most productive people oppose the policies espoused by the likes of Bernie, Booker, Beto, Kamala and other radical Leftists.

There's nothing at all "wrong," nor unexpected about that. Like Dan Cathy, Mark Zuckerberg has a right to change his views and to connect with whom he pleases.

THAT'S what's hurting the Democrat Party, unrealistic and unpopular policies that alienate productive people, NOT people becoming "traitors" to a given ideology.
.

I Was Almost Tempted to Believe This...ALMOST












.
.

CBS 11/28/2019 THANSGIVING DAY:
"Pres motorcade this morning pulls into Trump Intl Golf Club in West Palm Beach. By my count, his 61st visit to this course. It brings the number of days as Pres he's been to a golf club to 224." (Mark Knoller CBS) PHOTO Accompanying This BELOW https://t.co/ixrHg8zvbP

UNTIL...

...The great media critic Mark Dice noted;
"No, Mr. CBS White House Correspondent. The President was half way around the world serving Thanksgiving dinner to our troops stationed in Afghanistan." (Mark Dice)

Who to believe, CBS, ABC, CNN...OR Mark Dice, who admits to, "Making his YouTube videos in his kitchen"? Hmmmm....

For me, that was an EASY choice...Mark Dice EVERY TIME!
.
.
N.B. For those who STILL naively trust this media (all 6% of you), apparently Mark Knoller didn't coordinate his calumny with the other networks, as NBC had already reported on Trump's Thanksgiving visit to Afghanistan (https://www.nbcnews.com/…/trump-makes-surprise-thanksgiving…)

What can you expect from a media that delivered the "Ferguson Lie" ("Hands up, don't shoot," never happened), used a missile test in Kentucky as footage of a "Turkish air strike on Kurds in Syria," the Covington Catholic HATE Hoax, etc.

It IS rough when you can't trust your country's own media...BUT, that's where we are today.
.


Dr. Michael Scheuer (Former CIA Analyst) Says: 'An American Insurrection is Now Underway'



.

.

Dr. Michael Scheuer Says An American Insurrection is Already Under Way
https://youtu.be/ThUvCXivGds

Michael Scheuer has been a non partisan critic. He's been critical of the Bush and Clinton administrations for not having killed bin Laden and for a number of costly and disastrous policy missteps, and for not taking decisive measures to defend the country.

He has stated that Clinton had eight to ten opportunities to kill bin Laden prior to September 11th, and Bush had at least one opportunity before the 9/11 attacks.

According to Scheuer, it was Richard C. Clarke and the Clinton administration, that thwarted the CIA's ambitions to kidnap or kill bin Laden when they had the chance.

Today, Scheuer is largely pro Trump and anti Anglo-American Globalist.

This is an interesting interview.
.
American Ideas Click Here!