What REALLY Happened...in 2016?

.
.
Hillary Clinton offered her explanation of her 2016 loss, in her ponderous, whining tome, "Whaaa Happened," blaming "the media," specifically CNN & MSNBC, for not doing enough, nor campaigning hard enough, for her, and James Comey, despite saving her from immediate criminal indictment by changing his last phrase in describing her handling of classified information FROM "grossly negligent" (a criminal charge), TO  "extremely careless" (a non-legal term) for her own unelectability.

Here is a far more accurate accounting of the TRUTH about 2016; (https://youtu.be/wCOKz6a7TVk)

Trump was, in many ways, a creation of the DNC, which early on set two agendas, (1) eliminating Bernie Sanders as a viable Democratic opponent within that Party's Primaries and, (2) undermining the probable Republican opposition they were most concerned about (Bush, Rubio, Walker).

They initially saw Trump as the surest loser in a general election and the Democrat-controlled media lavished the most attention, the most coverage and the most free air time to Donald Trump.

On May 22nd, 2016, a national poll showed Trump leading 43.4% to 43.2%. The first time Trump led in any such poll.

Then, on May 25th, 2016 the DNC emails appeared on Wikileaks.

To this day, Julian Assange swears that they were LEAKED. The DNC claims they were hacked, in effect admitting to gross negligence/incompetence.

But WHY?

Today the DNC is nearly broke. Why would they admit to such gross negligence, and at such a cost?

The timing is highly suspicious. Trump takes the first lead in a national poll and three days later these DNC emails are dumped?

They know the late Seth Rich, a Bernie Sanders supporter, had downloaded those emails to a thumb drive and it's known that he'd been in contact with Wikileaks before the release of those emails, more than a month before his odd death, being shot and killed in "an apparent robbery," despite nothing being taken from him.

Donna Brazile, the interim DNC head, who'd wanted to replace Hillary Clinton with Joe Biden, dedicated her book ("Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House" https://www.amazon.com/dp/B073TWBKP4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_nAwIBbYJZAQ2W) in part to "the patriot Seth Rich," and Newsweek reported, "Rich appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she'd installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post." (https://www.newsweek.com/donna-brazile-book-seth-rich-dnc-murder-conspiracy-702838)

Is it more likely that the DNC, in order to slime a political enemy (Trump), dumped/leaked their own emails as part of a larger strategy, OR that Gucifer 2.0, ultimately found to be a Romanian cab driver; "On June 21, 2016, in an interview with Vice, "Guccifer 2.0" stated that he is Romanian, which is the nationality of Marcel Lehel Lazer, a Romanian hacker who originally used the "Guccifer" pseudonym," hacked the DNC's emails, as both the DNC and our "Intelligence Community" assert and is, in fact, not a Romanian, but a Russian agent?

I'm far more prone to believe Assange over Brennan, Clapper, Comey , or Strzok, myself.

How about you?
.
https://youtu.be/wCOKz6a7TVk