Hi Kids! Did any of you know that Hitler was a fan
of Islam and lamented Christianity’s hold on Europe?
I didn’t, so if you did, you’re way ahead of me on
this.
And what’s odd is that it’s hardly been a secret. In
fact on page 96 of Albert Speers’ Inside the Third Reich, we find this
little gem;
“Hitler
had been much impressed by a scrap of history he learned from a delegation of
distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France
into Central Europe, during the 8th Century, his visitors had told
him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won that
battle the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed
in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith.
The Germanic peoples would’ve become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was
perfectly suited to the German temperament. Hitler said that the conquering
Arabs, because of their inferior racial inferiority would’ve been unable to
contend with the harsher climate and conditions of that country. They could not
have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs, but
Islamized Germans could’ve stood at the head of the Mohammedan Empire.
Hitler
usually concluded his historical speculation by remarking, “You see, it’s been
our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why couldn’t we have had the
religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice to the fatherland as the highest
good? The Mohammedan religion would’ve
been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be
Christianity, with its meekness and flabbiness?”
The Islamic Baath Party was modeled after and based
upon Nazism
(See: Nazism and the Baath Party http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/baath.html)
and (The
Muslim Nazi Conection https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/the-muslim-nazi-connection/)
In the late 1960s, Wernher von Braun was alleged to
have answered a reporter’s question about the competing American and Soviet
Space Programs with, “There was never an American or Soviet Space
Program, but two Nazi Space Programs,” as many of the leading
scientists on both teams were from Germany’s rocket program.
It’s also been chronicled in many books that many
U.S.-based Corporations (IBM, GE, Chrysler, etc.) worked with the Germans
during WW II. Of course those were usually cases of Germany expropriating those
companies IN German-occupied areas and conscripting them to work on various
Nazi projects, BUT fact is, just as Germany’s Corporations, from Bayer and BASF
to Daimler-Benz and Porsche, became “Good members of a democratic West,” had
the Axis Powers won, most of the West’s Corporations were prepared to move on
as “Good Nazi citizens.”
In fact, it’s more than possible that many of the
world’s bankers expected and WANTED
Hitler to win that war! Yes, even many bankers here in the USA. Bankers like
Prescott Bush and Averill Harriman of the Union Banking Corporation, which was involved
with Hitler’s personal banker, Fritz Thyssen.
Bush was a founding member and one of seven
directors (including W. Averell Harriman, a leading Democratic operative/politician
at the time) of the Union Banking Corporation (holding a single share out
of 4,000 as a director), an investment bank that operated as a clearing house for
many assets and enterprises held by German steel magnate Fritz Thyssen. In
July 1942, the bank was suspected of holding gold on behalf of Nazi leaders. In
October of 1942 the United States seized the bank under the Trading With the Enemy Act and
held the assets for the duration of World War II.
It’s interesting that such a bi-partisan Nazism
existed in America even way back when, but maybe it’s not really all that
surprising. After all, just as Germany’s Corporations have survived WWII and
become “good Corporate citizens” (in fact, in the U.S. it’s been German
automakers who’ve pushed for Unions in non-Union, “Right-to-Work” States,
because they prefer to deal with a Union), America’s multi-national
Corporations were all prepared to survive that war, had the other side won and
become “good Nazi Companies.” Moreover, modern Progressivism, which is
predicated on Corporatism, the economic system of fascism, was an entirely
Republican political innovation in America. Teddy Roosevelt forged America’s
first Progressive Party. In response, Warren G. Harding won the 1920 Election
by the widest margin in American history by running AGAINST Progressivism.
By the 1950s there was a bipartisan agreement that
Corporatism was the most efficient political system in existence. It was
Prescott Bush and Averill Harriman who brought about today’s political dynamic –
a veritable ONE Party system. As with most such changes a crisis point was
needed and the crisis point that presented itself to that dynamic was the
assassination of JFK. It was only in the chaos after JFK’s assignation that the
move to, in effect, unify both Parties into a “Red Team” vs “Blue Team” Uniparty
was able to be realized.
It was in the wake of the JFK assassination that
Democrats came fully to embrace the warfare state, with LBJ’s “All in” on
Vietnam AND brought about Nixon’s “Southern Strategy.”
Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” was NOT a move to marginalize
the black vote at all. It was used specifically to alienate working class
Northern ethnic Catholics and Southern whites from their own Party and have
them welcomed onto a GOP Plantation, managed by its moneyed interests, then
often called “Rockefeller-Republicans,” or Country Club Republicans.” These
were the likes of the Bush’s, Graham’s, McCain’s, Hatch’s, Rockefeller’s, Chafee’s
etc.).
Could this have been “the Nazi’s Poison Pill,” the
zygote of the 4th Reich?
In some regards, it’s the ONLY way to make sense out of what’s happening in Europe right now
(video about Muslim atrocities and Euro government’s cracking down on Europeans
who stand up against it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z35bbBBwQHQ&index=4&list=FLBO6D_U0RPjY_YPg-_-cqIg)
MULTICULTURALISM
is the tool of cultural destruction.
Whites in BOTH
the U.S. and Europe have been the first to see it clearly, BUT the goal of MULTICULTURALISM
is not only the eradication of all existing “races,” BUT also of all existing cultures, with the creation of a new
Uni-culture coming out of it...at least “ideally.” That idea mostly appeals to
multi-national Corporations who see more customers as the optimum Corporate
strategy.
Make no mistake, Corporations and international banks
have always led governments, NOT the
reverse. Policy doesn’t “bubble up” among elected officials/legislators, it is
dictated to those managers by Corporate officials, often referred to as “Lobbyists.”
Lobbyists are often wrongly seen as Corporate shills who go to Washington, D.C.
to curry favor, when, in truth, they go to D.C. and other Capitols with the
dictates of the major banks and Corporations, which are demanded of by their “bought
& paid for” political managers.
Corporations DON’T
NEED to curry favor from professional politicians, it’s the reverse –
politicians, ALL politicians must
first curry favor with the Corporations in order to get elected and then
maintain the favor of those Corporations to remain in Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment