I was recently very pleased to come across a great article by Peter Bregman (https://hbr.org/2012/03/diversity-training-doesnt-work).
In it, Mr. Bregman notes that, “Diversity training doesn’t extinguish prejudice. It promotes it,”
adding, “At
first glance, the first training — the one that outlined what people could and
couldn’t say — didn’t seem to hurt. But on further inspection, it turns out it
did.”
Bregman
acknowledges that, “People aren’t
prejudiced against real people; they’re prejudiced against categories. “Sure,
John is gay,” they’ll say, “but he’s not like other gays.” Their problem isn’t
with John, but with gay people in general, and adds that it’s categories themselves
that are dehumanizing.”
Perhaps
Mr. Bregman’s deepest insight is that, “When
people divide into categories to illustrate the idea of diversity, it
reinforces the idea of the categories.”
I largely agree with this article. Most petty
bigotries are rooted in a nebulous "other," by the viewer and do not
hold up when they meet actual individuals. Whereas “groups” and “movements” can
seem threatening and contentious, most individuals are not.
The problem with diversity training is that it all
too often unwittingly, or not, promotes a pernicious ideological and ethnic
bigotry of its own. To be effective in truly promoting “inclusion” and “tolerance”
it MUST BE non-judgmental in its
approach to ALL ideologies, regardless of how un-inclusive some of those ideologies
might be.
IF
the idea is to get people to learn to "live together" (inclusion),
that can't be done by demonizing SOME,
as that approach itself is rooted in exclusion.
For instance, one of the problems with
"race-based" diversity training is that it STILL insists on using racial constructs to oppose racism. IF racism and bigotry are wrong (and they
ARE), then so is ALL "race consciousness," ALL "counting by race" & ALL race-based "remedies."
Ending "racism" as we've come to know it, requires the end of the
very concept of race and replacing it with a much more neutral concept of
"ethnicity." This is why a Pro-Black Agenda IS every bit as "racist" & WRONG as a Pro-White one & why sanctioned "Black
Groups," or "Women's Groups" are every bit as pernicious as are
exclusively "White and male GROUPS."
Ending “racism” requires more than what Chief
Justice Roberts said, “STOP counting by
race,” but for us to STOP
looking at race as the all-defining construct that it is not.
IF
the problem is exclusivity (and it IS),
then the antidote is NOT continuing
to utilize exclusivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment