There are ONLY two consistent positions on the
issues of abortion and Capital Punishment; that of the Catholic Church, that "ALL
life is sacred," (opposing BOTH) and the one similar to my
own...that NO life is actually sacred, (supporting BOTH). A pregnant teen, seeing
that having a child that early in life might anchor them both in poverty, in my
view, has a right to terminate that pregnancy...which amounts to taking a life.
Beyond that, an unwilling parent is also an unfit parent, at least at that
time. That teen is taking a life to better her own. Society MUST have the right
and the will to do the same. It is simply better that some of the most
dysfunctional and destructive people in a society be excised for the greater
good of the rest.
Ironically enough, of the two inconsistent views,
the pro-life/anti-abortion & pro-death penalty is the most moral of the
two, in that it (naively, in my view) seeks to "protect the
innocent," while maintaining the ultimate punishment for the most heinous
acts. I support abortion-on-demand and would MANDATE contraception and abortion
(when necessary) for ALL dependent poor. I would support a requirement for DNA
evidence confirming guilt (presence at the crime scene) for all death penalty
cases, but I oppose our sterile sentencing with an emphasis on
"painlessness." Capital punishment is SUPPOSED to be just that...a
punishment. On that particular score, the adherents of Sharia Law administer a
"more perfect form of justice." STILL, guilt should be firmly
established. IF the concern is truly the misapplication of the death penalty,
then the cure is to mandate stricter guidelines for establishing guilt. The
misapplication of justice is no more an argument against the death penalty than
it is an argument against prisons. Many, MANY innocent people have been
imprisoned for decades...and we don't debate eradicating the prison system.
No comments:
Post a Comment