I finally got around to seeing Lone Survivor, though
after reading Marcus Luttrell’s book by the same title, I wasn't all that
enthusiastic about seeing what I knew would be a grisly account of a U.S. Navy
Seal Unit shredded in the mountains of Afghanistan.
It was not, as some have suggested, a “testament
to the brave men and women who serve
in the U.S. military.” For one thing, there wasn’t a single female character in the film, aside from photos of one SEAL’s (Matt Axelson’s) wife. The film neither sought out females for
gratuitous “eye candy,” nor to make fictional heroines out of thin air. I find that commendable in this age. I’m almost certain
that there are, as yet, no female members of the Special Forces and definitely
none in the SEALS.
I've worked with a number of former Special Forces
members and they, rightly or wrongly (probably rightly), tend to look down on the
non-combatant members of the Military, or at least hold the members of their
own elite fraternities in much higher regard.
The film starts off with some background on the
individuals involved and the extreme training they go through...a training that
washes out the vast majority of the candidates by forcing each member to force
their bodies to do things they wouldn't believe they could do...like simulated
drowning – being tossed into a pool with hands and feet bound and rescued well
after they’d run out of air. Rescued members are shown unconscious, having the
water pumped out of their lungs.
The Military Channel has long shown documentaries
about “Hell Week,” so most people already know that these are the best we've got. Few, if any members of Congress could’ve passed such rigors at the height
of their youth, It’s unlikely that many, if ANY professional athletes could
make the cut as well.
Some might rightly note, “How many of these guys would make any professional rosters?”
Probably very few, but the skill sets are completely different, whereas
athletes fine tune their bodies to do a set of specific tasks extremely well,
these guys seek to master a very wide range of skill sets without regard to
their own bodies at all. They condition themselves to force their bodies beyond
its natural parameters.
At heart, the film shows the disaster that is the
misguided view that “America can win modern wars with very few ‘boots on the
ground’ by relying on drones, air support and some strategically placed Special
Forces Units.”
It’s a badly misinformed viewpoint because it never
works. It didn't work in Somalia, when an American Ranger Battalion went in
light and took heavy losses as a result.
AND it didn't work here in Operation Red Wing, where 6 SEALS were attacked by over 200 Taliban insurgents.
Tasked with finding a Taliban leader who’d killed 20
U.S. Marines the week before, they trek out into the mountains of Afghanistan
and track down this Taliban leader. Almost as soon as they spot him, an old man
and two young boys herding some goats discover the SEALS, who quickly capture
them. The three goat herders carry a radio that links to the Taliban camp
below, so they know that these are NOT friendlies. At that point they’re forced
to make a fateful decision...of their three choices; (1) kill them right there,
(2) gag them and tie them to trees and let them get eaten by animals of freeze
to death overnight, or (3) let them go, abort the mission and head to higher
ground for extraction.
It’s decided that the “rules of engagement” demand
that they let the three go. That turns out to be a disastrous decision in
this case, for when they reach the peak of the mountain they’re on, they’re
still unable to establish good
communication and within hours are surrounded by heavily armed Taliban
insurgents where they take withering fire, while inflicting massive casualties
among the enemy. Thankfully, neither the book nor the film glorifies battle, as it shows the horrific wounds these guys endure as they literally fight to the death. After
being chased all over the hilly terrain, most of them are forced to fight on
with multiple gunshot wounds, and traumatic injuries from falling down crevices, slamming
off rocks and trees, etc. Luttrell does a good job of showing that the
firefight offered no glory, only massive amounts of fear and pain, as these
elite warriors are literally shredded by an “army” that outnumbers them by well over 30
to 1.
When one of them finally is able to make contact
with their base, the rescue helicopters are forced to respond without their
accompanying gunships, which had been commandeered by another task-force. One of
the helicopters is dropped with an RPG, killing its entire crew and the other
is forced to abandon its rescue mission, leaving Luttrell and Axelson to fend
for themselves.
They wind up split up and Axelson is killed, while
Luttrell survives by hiding in a rocky crevice where he stays overnight.
When he starts hiking out the next day, dragging one
badly torn up leg, and suffering numerous other gunshot wounds and other
traumatic injuries, he comes across a small pool of water, where he is found by
villagers as he was washing out some of his wounds.
They take him back to their village, where the man
and his son who found him protect him from the Taliban according to their code of Pashtunwali - "Pashtunwali promotes
self-respect, independence, justice, hospitality, love, forgiveness,
revenge and tolerance toward all (especially to
strangers or guests)." The very same people who embrace the codes of Melmastia (hospitality) –
“showing hospitality and profound respect to all visitors, regardless of race,
religion, national affiliation or economic status and doing so without any hope
of remuneration or favor,” and Nanawatai (asylum) – “derived from the verb
meaning to go in, this refers to the protection given to a person
against his or her enemies...people are protected at all costs; even those
running from the law must be given refuge until the situation can be clarified,”
ALSO embrace Badal
(“justice”/revenge) – “to seek
justice or take revenge against the wrongdoer. There is
considered to be no time limit to the period in which revenge can be taken.
Justice in Pashtun lore needs elaborating: even a mere taunt (or
"Paighor") is regarded as an insult which usually can only be
redressed by shedding the taunter's blood. If he is out of reach, his closest
male relation must suffer the penalty instead. Badal may lead to a blood feud
that can last generations and involve whole tribes with the loss of hundreds of
lives. Normally blood feuds in this male-dominated society are settled in a
number of usually violent ways.”
Luttrell's account shows the complexities of these engagements and how poorly America understands such cultures. It seems to suggest that there MUST be a better way to fight terrorism than this haphazard, half in, half out approach we've used for over a decade.
Marcus
Luttrell was fortunate enough to have been found by Pashtun villagers who
actually saved him from his Taliban pursuers in accordance with their own code,
even at great risk to themselves (the village was subsequently attacked by
Taliban insurgents).
Luttrell
(the lone survivor of Operation Red Wing) was brought back with an onboard defibrillator
on the helicopter ride back to the base.
The
film ends showing all the members killed in that action, the 6 SEALs and those
aboard the helicopter downed when it came to rescue them. It showed photos of
them in the Military juxtaposed with those from their outside lives. It also showed Marcus Luttrell returning to that Afghan village to emnbrace the family that saved his life.
Neither
the book nor the film is as much a “testament” as a cautionary tale of how we
so easily and cavalierly sacrifice the very best America has to offer on a
misguided tactic that has consistently failed us – “Too light to fight, freeze at
night.” In many ways, it's as vociferously an anti-war movie as has ever been made. In fact it echos a book by David Starr Jordan that came out 99 years ago this coming march, titled War and the Breed (https://archive.org/details/warandbreedrela01jordgoog), which makes the case that war is the most dysgenic exercise ever undertaken by man, because it kills off and maims the best - the youngest, bravest and strongest, leaving only, in Jordan's words, "the weaklings and wastrels" to breed and pass along their defective traits, thereby weakening each nation a hundred fold.
I
agree with a West Point graduate I know, “If you’re not ready to risk 10,000
casualties, DON’T risk 10.” If an engagement isn't worth a massive risk, than find another way to resolve the conflict.
ESPECIALLY
don’t risk 10 of the irreplaceable best!
2 comments:
Excellent, excellent post.... thanks for this!
Your welcome FB! It's an excellent film and an even better book and it highlights the absolute waste of life...the BEST of our youth in such endeavors because politicians find it expedient to risk the FEW rather than commit to a large scale offensive with the potential for a wider risk pattern.
Post a Comment