“...Did we blame Christians after the first World Trade Center
Is this really the best argument they’ve got?!
The pseudo-controversy over the Ground Zero Mosque (the building slated to hose the Cordoba House was hit on 9/11 and stands just 600’ from the footprints of the Twin Towers
Ironically enough, the police and firefighter and the family members of those emergency service workers killed on 9/11 have fought for religious tolerance across New York city, usually against many of those lined up supporting the Cordoba House today.
So if it’s not about religious tolerance (and it’s NOT), then what is it about?
The opposition to a center devoted to teaching Sharia Law, is sensitivity for those 3,000 souls murdered that day by Sharia adherents. Bill Warner’s wonderful site Political Islam is THE best source for making Sharia Law understandable to non-Muslims.
There are no common principles between American law and Sharia Law.
Under Sharia law:
· There is no freedom of religion
· There is no freedom of speech
· There is no freedom of thought
· There is no freedom of artistic expression
· There is no freedom of the press
· There is no equality of peoples-a non-Muslim, a Kafir (non-Muslim), is never equal to a Muslim
· There are no equal rights for women
· Women can be beaten
· A non-Muslim cannot bear arms
· There is no equal protection under Sharia for different classes of people. Justice is dualistic, with one set of laws for Muslim males and different laws for women and non-Muslims.
· Our Constitution is a man-made document of ignorance, jahiliyah, that must submit to Sharia
· There is no democracy, since that means that a non-Muslim is equal to a Muslim
· Non-Muslims are dhimmis, third-class citizens
· There is no Golden Rule
· There is no critical thought
There is no such thing as “radicalized” or “fundamentalist” Islam, since Islam has never had a Reformation. The Sharia-based “Islam” practiced by the Taliban IS traditional Islam...it is NOT at all “radicalized” nor “fundamentalist,” in any way.
3 comments:
As soon as they move into Dar al-Harb (the lands of the infidel) in any numbers, Muslims think they have a God-given right to dominate public space and intimidate the infidels into submission.
Mosques are of course notorious examples of this ( see Mosque Blight - http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/mosque-blight.html ) but their swaggering, aggressive arrogance and sense of preferential entitlement make them obnoxious to the kuffar inhabitants in many other ways.
The notorious Ground Zero Victory Mosque is just the latest example of a process that has been going on for years in the West, and centuries in lands conquered by Islam: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2010/01/muslim-domination-of-public-space.html
There is another reason that we did not blame Christians for the first WTC bombing. That could be because it was NOT perpetrated by Christians. Or if they WERE Christians, they were some of the weirdest named Christians in history.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing
@Russell Simmons: you are a moron. Show me the Christians that attacked the WTC in '93. Show me the Christians that attacked the WTC in '01. *BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZER* Show me the Christians that strap on explosives and attack women and children.
You can't. Your argument is as moronic as you are.
Kick their butt with reason, logic and fact, JMK.
PS: I will never submit my rights or my life to Sharia. Barry and his suck ups can go to Hell, and take Sharia with them.
Post a Comment