Even MORE Really DUMB Memes...

.
.
.

Because...."Science"

Funny story, critics of Anthropogenic Climate Change and Evolution, in particular, DON'T challenge any "science," in fact, many of them seem to understand the science far better than the Arts & Humanities Leftist lemmings. Their issue seems to be with our misinformed, or disinformation media and our government.

CLIMATE CHANGE: The International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), a coalition of 140+ climate scientists, economists, and engineers, in the “Core Principles” section of its website (accessed May 17, 2017), wrote:

“Global climate is always changing in accordance with natural causes and recent changes are not unusual...

"Science is rapidly evolving away from the view that humanity’s emissions of carbon dioxide and other ‘greenhouse gases’ are a cause of dangerous climate change...

"Climate models used by the IPCC [United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] fail to reproduce known past climates without manipulation and therefore lack the scientific integrity needed for use in climate prediction and related policy decision-making...

"Claims that ‘consensus’ exists among climate experts regarding the causes of the modest warming of the past century are contradicted by thousands of independent scientists…

"Research that identifies the Sun as a major driver of global climate change must be taken more seriously...

"Carbon dioxide and other ‘greenhouse gas’ emissions from human activity – energy production, transportation, cement production, heating and cooling, etc.- appear to have only a very small impact on global climate.”

"May 17, 2017 -International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)"

Also SEE: https://www.express.co.uk/…/100-reasons-why-climate-change-…
.
.
EVOLUTION: Ironically enough, evolution has been embraced by many religious "Intelligent Design" adherents as a "Non random force of intelligent design."

Actual science has a very different view.

DIFFERENT from BOTH Intelligent Design adherents AND those who still think Darwin is some unimpeachable source (https://www.epm.org/…/…/3/ten-major-flaws-evolution-revised/)

& (http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1551)

One of the main arguments against Darwin is the explosion of vastly different forms of life after each of the 6 major extinctions, events in which over 90% of the existing life on Earth perished at the time.

"The complexity of living systems could never evolve by chance—they had to be designed and created. A system that is irreducibly complex has precise components working together to perform the basic function of the system. (A mousetrap is a simple example.) If any part of that system were missing, the system would cease to function. Gradual additions could not account for the origin of such a system. It would have to come together fully formed and integrated. Many living systems exhibit this (vision, blood-clotting, etc.). When you look at a watch, you assume there was a watchmaker. A watch is too complex to “happen” by chance. Yet such living systems are almost infinitely more complex than a watch. They could not be random — they simply had to be designed and created."

VACCINES: While I support the fact that vaccines are overwhelmingly good (https://www.scientificamerican.com/…/fact-or-fiction-vacci…/)

&

(https://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/do-vaccines-cause-autism), many question the explosion in the quantity of vaccines over the past 40 years. The problem most have with this explosion in vaccinations ISN'T over science, it's with a government they do not trust.
.